=====
From emkaah@xs4all.nl:
Good style. One of my favorites.









=====
From helene.dumur@free.fr:
Please... have a thought to the poor people not naturally english speaking, your
text is so long... It's difficult and boring to read all that !

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Some good stuff here. particularly the flames shooting up.  The low polygon
people detract from the realism, giving more of a painting aspect. Not sure if
this was intentional or not.  The camera should be further away IMO, as until I
read your description I didn't even know it was supposed to be a boat.

=====
From t.degroot@inter.nl.net:
Nice. I like the very simple figures, they are very expressive. The fire is well
done, however the splashes in the water look more like glass.



=====
From bertram.henze@t-online.de:
The flames look good, but the people should be burning much better because they
all look like paper mache - Ok, living creatures are the hardest challenge in
raytracing, and I have seen no credible example so far. The water seems to be
liquid sugar - the splashes looking so solid and frozen in mid-air; real water
would make tiny drops.

=====
From slone@hiwaay.net:
Wonderful characters, very stylish and well-posed. The splashes
let the image down a bit, they look like ice. Great job on the
ceiling flames.


=====
From file:
One of the two entries on this round that are technically AND artistically first
class. Great job with the people: one figure has more character than ten Poser
things. The fire is just brilliant and the picture has a beautiful contrast of
yellow and blue. Only thing that doesn't look quite right are the splashes.


=====
From file:
One of my favorites, good rendition of the atmosphere of a fire (dynamic looking
characters, vivid lighting, good camera setting), even if each element of the
scene is not perfectly realistic on its own. 
Notable for composition, lighting